It's all a semantics game...
Remember the good old days of the republican majority? When a simple majority vote would usually pass a bill? Back when the headlines and tv and radio hosts would report how democrats are blocking something with a filibuster? When you heard not so subtle threats of the 'nuclear option' when talk of a democratic filibuster came up? Remember the right wing talking heads railing about obstructionist democrats? If you are Alberto Gonzales and don't recall, take a look at this, this(second half), and this. How much ink was given to democratic filibusters and the nuclear option? Lots.
Do you wonder what headlines you see when republicans filibuster 2 (or more) bills this week? Judging by the AP articles on the habeus corpus bill and leave and deployment time bill that ran in most newspapers; there will be no mention of filibuster or blocking. Not one. Why did these bills fail?
"The proposal... failed on a 56-44 vote, with 60 votes needed for passage"
Why 60 votes you may wonder? Don't look to the articles for help.
Hint: it rhymes with General Custer
Semantics Game
by Muntaba Lambego @ 9/20/2007
Tags: nuclear option, semantics
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
I thought it would take 51 votes to pass in the Senate, and 60 to bust up a filibuster......But no mention of "obstructionist" tactics? Interesting.
Post a Comment